StopHS2 are now playing on the fears of Liverpudlians and are happily tweeting about the demise of Liverpool should the line be extended further North. I'm not angered by the fact that StopHS2 are using this despicable tactic, it's to be expected when there so much personal self interest riding on this. What does annoy me though is that those opposing HS2 have the gall to say that they care about the North and Liverpool.
The public could be forgiven for believing that those behind StopHS2 really do care about tax payers and do actually care about Liverpool's plight, they do after all make a good emotive case and know all of the manipulation tricks in the book. So it may come as a surprise to those who have been sucked in by the opposition to find out that far from caring about Liverpool, the implications of the so called "alternative" favoured by anti-HS2 campaigners would have a dire consequences for Liverpool
Let looks at the argument used by StopHS2, they claim that Liverpool will lose out economically if the journey time to Liverpool is longer than that to Manchester. This despite StopHS2 insistence that journey time savings do not benefit regional economies, this has been at heart of their argument against HS2 from the start.
If we forget this argument for the moment and look at capacity, opponents claim that Liverpool will see a reduction in seating capacity due to HS2, despite a doubling of rail services from the city to London after the introduction of HS2 services in 2026.
So HS2 is bad for Liverpool is it? Depends if you believe Liverpool will need additional capacity in the future or not? Those opposed to HS2 certainly don't seem to think it will, not according to the so called "alternative" that they have been working on for almost 2 years.
Lets take a look at the following "alternative" WCML services diagram.
So to clarify, StopHS2 is claiming Liverpool will lose out to Manchester if HS2 goes ahead, whilst at the same time promoting an alternative that gives extra capacity for Manchester in the form of greater numbers trains which will be longer than those serving Liverpool, with the outcome being that Liverpool will see no net capacity gain beyond Dec 2012, with no journey time savings what so ever.
For those Liverpudlians tempted join the StopHS2 campaign I would seriously consider the alternative that they propose first. For more information regarding how this "alternative" will have devastating consequences for other towns and cities click here.

2 comments:
HS2 needs to rejoin the WCML at Weaver Junction, which is a few miles South of Warrington. That minor concession is all it will take to make the Liverpool journey fast and make the Liverpool folks into happy campers. There are no expensive obstacles to building the line to there - it is all flat open countryside. The ten miles or so of cheap extra HS2 track will take very little time to Scotland at around 200mph.
I completely agree with this article and the above comment. Have you thought about making press releases. As one of the largest 'Yes' campaigns, shouldn't you be delivering these valid arguments to the general public, not just anyone who bothers to come on this website? It is extremely unlikely that any of the 'No' brigade are going to come on here.
Post a Comment